Skip to Main Content
(203) 255-4150
image for There’s An Epidemic of Discrimination Against Pregnant Women at Work (NY Times 6.17.18)


On Sunday June 17, 2018 the New York Times posted an article,  There’s An Epidemic of Discrimination Against Pregnant Women at Work involving a case attorney Mark Carey is working on.
The article reported œThroughout the American workplace,  pregnancy discrimination  remains widespread. It can start as soon as a woman is showing, and it often lasts through her early years as a mother… Many of the country’s largest and most prestigious companies still systematically sideline pregnant women. They pass them over for promotions and raises. They fire them when they complain… In corporate office towers, the discrimination tends to be more subtle. Pregnant women and mothers are often perceived as less committed, steered away from prestigious assignments, excluded from client meetings and slighted at bonus season.

The NY Times article explored Erin Murphy’s willful pregnancy and sex discrimination case against her current employer Glencore:

œAs a senior woman at Glencore, the world’s largest commodity trading company, Erin Murphy is a rarity. She earns a six-figure salary plus a bonus coordinating the movement of the oil that Glencore buys and sells. Most of the traders whom she works with are men.
The few women at the company have endured a steady stream of sexist comments, according to Ms. Murphy. Her account of Glencore’s culture was verified by two employees, one of whom recently left the company. They requested anonymity because they feared retaliation.
On the company’s trading floor, men bantered about groping the Queen of England’s genitals. As Glencore was preparing to relocate from Connecticut to New York last February, the traders ” including Ms. Murphy’s boss, Guy Freshwater ” openly discussed how much œhot ass there would be at the gym near the new office.

In 2013, a year after Ms. Murphy arrived, Mr. Freshwater described her in a performance review as œone of the hardest working colleagues. In a performance review the next year, he called her a œstrong leader who is œdiligent, conscientious and determined.

But when Ms. Murphy told Mr. Freshwater she was pregnant with her first child, he told her it would œdefinitely plateau her career, she said in the affidavit. In 2016, she got pregnant with her second child.

One afternoon, Mr. Freshwater announced to the trading floor that  the most-read article  on the BBC’s website was about pregnancy altering women’s brains. Ms. Murphy, clearly showing, was the only pregnant woman there. œIt was like they assumed my brain had totally changed overnight, Ms. Murphy, 41, said in an interview. œI was seen as having no more potential.

When she was eight months pregnant, she discussed potential future career moves with Mr. Freshwater. According to her, Mr. Freshwater responded, œYou’re old and having babies so there’s nowhere for you to go. A Glencore spokesman declined to comment on Mr. Freshwater’s behalf. After she came back from four months of maternity leave, she organized her life so that having children wouldn’t interfere with her career. She arranged for child care starting at 7 a.m. so she would never be late. But as her co-workers were promoted, her bosses passed her over and her bonuses barely rose, Ms. Murphy said.

When there was an opening to be the head of her department, Ms. Murphy said she never got a chance to apply. The job instead went to a less experienced man. Ms. Murphy said an executive involved in the selection process had previously asked repeatedly whether she had adequate child care.

Ms. Murphy said that after she missed out on another job, the same Glencore executive told her it was because of the timing of her maternity leave. Ms. Murphy has retained a lawyer and is planning to file a lawsuit against Glencore.

In response to the NY Times article Attorney Jill Saluck commented, œSometimes a pregnant employee will be subject to blatantly discriminatory remarks by her employer, indicating a clear bias against pregnant workers. But more often, pregnancy discrimination is much more insidious. Often after pregnancy, a woman’s career will suddenly and inexplicably plateau.   Her non-pregnant coworkers will receive raises and promotions, but despite her consistent hard work, she will not be afforded the same opportunities.  If this is happening to you at work, chances are that you’re not the only employee that has been subject to this type of discriminatory treatment.  Pregnancy discrimination  is not just unfair, its illegal, and employers must be called out for derailing the careers of pregnant employees.

In the case reported in the NY Times article,  Erin Murphy v. Glencore, Ms. Murphy filed her legal action in the District of Connecticut on June 18, 2018 (Erin Murphy v. Glencore, Ltd, 3:18-CV-1027 D.Conn). The case will proceed to a jury trial and we expect the jury to send a strong message to the company that  pregnancy discrimination  will not be tolerated and punished severely.

There’s An Epidemic of Discrimination Against Pregnant Women at Work (NY Times 6.17.18)
If you need assistance with your pregnancy discrimination issues at work, please do not hesitate to  contact us .

Employee Survival Guide

NY Times The Daily The Rampant Problem of Pregnancy Discrimination Part 2

Firing Pregnant Women Really Ticks Me Off!