In this episode of the Employee Survival Guide, Mark discusses how employees have little knowledge and information about their employment rights and it is not their fault. Mark examines the employer’s role to maintain constant control and providing limited information about employment rights to protect employees. Mark argues that employers treat employees like opponents by using manipulative employment practices, including forced arbitration, noncompetition agreements, employment at will. Employers need to spend more money and energy helping employees not setting them up for failure.
If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts.
For more information, please contact our employment lawyers at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.
The content of this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice nor create an attorney-client relationship. Carey & Associates, P.C. makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy of the information contained on this website or to any website to which it is linked to.
Transcript:
Unknown:
Hey, it’s Mark here, and welcome to the next edition of the Employee Survival Guide, where we tell you everything your employer does not want you to know about in much more. Today’s episode, we’re talking about employee apathy about their employment rights and deceptive employer practices. We all work, we are not all equal in terms of our knowledge of working. In fact, there’s a complete absence of accessible information related to a general internet search for the following phrase, employee knowledge of employment rights, or any similar search terms. Why is that? And I’m excluding from this search any legal sites like ours, a cap clause comm from the search? What forces are at play here? Is this the result of a concerted employer human resource community lobbyists to conceal information from the masses? The simple answer? Yeah, there are 157 million working Americans. And there are no businesses or websites marketing to this population, to aid them in understanding their employment rights and benefits. Sites like Glassdoor, indeed, LinkedIn, zipper quarter, monster, etc. Do not serve up information about employee rights and benefits. Why is that? In contrast, there are hundreds if not 1000s of websites, providing consulting services to employers from everything to payroll consulting, dealing with employee apathy, risk management, human resource functions, and training and the latest is unconscious bias training. There are two forces at play here. After many years of handling employment cases, I have unique and comprehensive understanding about all things considered employment. I discovered that employees are apathetic regarding learning about employment rights at all, mostly due to fear of challenging their employers, and the presumption that employment laws are only for the understanding of management teams, human resource departments, lawyers and judges. Similarly, I have having dealt with hundreds of employers, I’ve concluded that employers, defense counsel and employer lobby groups have worked diligently to keep employees in check, and most importantly, in the dark about the rights why, simply to control employees. You see, knowledge is power. But here the knowledge is only possessed by employers see the imbalance? Do you feel the same way employee apathy about their legal rights? The type of employee apathy I’m referring to here is not the typical employee apathy you often hear about, for example, in re engaging employees to do the work they were hard for. What I have seen from clients over the years is a lack of working knowledge of employment laws to provide internal guidance and protection against their employers. We typically see clients rushing after an emergency at work like receiving a pip. Let’s call a performance improvement plan, or a severance package upon termination. The clients are desperate for answers, and what their legal rights are when faced with these situations. I’m not shaming or faulting apathetic employees here, because employers actually cause the apathy in the first place. How are employers creating apathetic employees concerted employer disinformation. Employers maintain employee apathy by controlling everything about your employment, including the information employers are provided. Think of the bland information your employer provides about employment rights on the internal HR portals are contained in the employee handbooks. The content is written for defense purposes only, and is reactionary rather than concerted employee focused attention in the vise giving reactionary because employers were previously sued, lost or settled and have shored up their employment defenses through HR content. Employers missed the mark. They view employees as only essential for for for profit reasons, but treat employees as opponents in every other regard. This oppositional attitude is beginning to wane and employers are deeply worried employees should speak up for themselves and demand to be treated more fairly. employers should trust employees more than they currently do. Also, tenuous is the siren call for more diversity inclusion by employers in response to racial social tensions last summer, we all knew and now and no, this is just a marketing event for most companies to get in line with the movements and nothing to do with leveling the playing field with employees of any race, age, disability, gender, etc. After litigating far too many employment cases, I came to the realization that employers do not care about employees, only controlling them and bolstering profit margins. Employers both large and small, seek to limit the amount of employment law information they want employees know about. But you may say that employers provide an appropriate level of employment information for all employees to consume, understand and adhere to. Yes, I know there’s a poster about employment rights next to the copier. But did you read it? Yes, I know there’s an employment manual. But did you read that to your employer and now some states require your attendance with company sponsored seminars, training on sexual harassment and other forms of discrimination? Did you turn the volume down when listening to the recording enough just to hear the code to submit to the vendor or HR. Yes, I thought so. What is the motivation of by employers to limit or conceal employment information from employees? Again, employers seek to maintain a command or control work environment. In other words, the less information employees are provided about employment laws and their employment rights, the more control employers have. Employees spend considerable amounts of time of their lives working, gathering information and experience building individual careers. But even as employees work endlessly, they never seem to gather a working knowledge of employment law, and their employment rights. such laws plainly seek to protect. It is truly a dysfunctional relationship, where and employers don’t talk about employment law issues openly hoping the issues just disappear on the rug somehow. Sound familiar? If the opposite were true, I would have no reason to write this article. Employers have a direct incentive to keep employees in the dark regarding employment laws and regulations. The less employees know about their employment rights, the more control and human resource departments have over employees in the workplace in general, the more control the more risk employers take with employees, oftentimes illegally. And that’s where I come in. Ask yourself this question. When’s the last time your employer spent time with you explaining what your employment rights are, and how you can protect yourself against the employer. This type of communication never happens in any company. Why? management concluded it always needs to be in control over employees. And this ideology has roots going back hundreds of years. But now this management tactic appears outdated, antithetical to employee rights and current social thinking. new emerging employee attitudes. Employee attitudes are changing dramatically in wake of the COVID-19 work from home strategy employed by many companies, and the cultural unrest of the summer of 2020. employees feel more productive when they have flexibility to define their day around personal and business needs. These employees are collectively being heard by management, and our near term work life future may very well involve some form of hybrid work from home environment. Employees argue they are more productive working in this hybrid model. And many employers agree. employers should listen more closely to employees and discover what their employees really want. employees want more control of their daily lives. Instead, the unbridled eight to 10 hour work days of the past few cases some employers are exploring the four day work week, under the conclusion that more time off will make employees more efficient and loyal. Although social consciousness has substantially increased regarding equality and diversity, employee attitudes related to job discrimination, employment rights in general has remained stalled in neutral for the past 30 years. Honestly, employees are not at fault here. Employers are created a default management practice or phrase I like to use often because no one does. There was a conservative management practice propagated by consulting companies employer side defense attorneys to run operations with a firm management control ideology. The simple ideology entails little information sharing maintenance of fear amongst employees to deter challenges to management decision making, the so called pro retaliatory animus, and overuse of noncompetition and forced arbitration agreements and the perpetual use of implement I will rule where are we headed? I predict our current stressful times and political climate will result in dramatic improvements in our workplaces. Employers now realize that cannot continue to treat employees just as widgets, it must create ways to garner employee trust and create a fairer working environment. For example, Amazon just snuffed out a union attempt by convincing employees the company can do more than what the Union would provide on their behalf. Employers must treat employees as co equals in the workplace. Instead of as opponents. Employers must remove the oppressive implement that will rule and replace it with the termination for cause rule, which are the same rules used in the Union organized shops without the union dues. Employers must remove the forced arbitration like Google did in 2019, enforce confidentiality settlement agreements and make all employment matters externally transparent, ie less dysfunction. Yes, I’m talking about you Bridgewater associates in General Electric. Finally, employers must protect their coveted employees by providing objective and neutral educational information about employee rights. Instead of using employment defense counsel to give employment law seminars to employees, employers should hire plaintiff Employment Lawyers to speak to employees about their employment rights. Our employers concern employees will discover Information Management did not want them to know about, of course, that’s the point. The combination of less secrecy more education will directly result in less inequality, less racism, less ageism, less discrimination across every employment category. employees will feel more protected than opposed or trusted and loyal to their employers mission. Why hasn’t this happened sooner? employers keep getting the same old default manner and advice are too scared to take the rest to do the right thing. I just saved employers millions and consulting fees if they would just only accept my free suggestions. If you’d like more information about this article, please contact our firm Carey Associates PC on the web at ww.capclaw.com. Have a great wee. Talk to you soon.